Markov fluid queue model of an energy harvesting IoT device with adaptive sensing (2024)

Skip Abstract Section

1. b1 I. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, E. Cayirci, A survey on sensor networks, IEEE Commun. Mag., 40 (2002) 102-114. Google ScholarDigital Library
2. b2 J. Yick, B. Mukherjee, D. Ghosal, Wireless sensor network survey, Comput. Netw., 52 (2008) 2292-2330. Google ScholarDigital Library
3. b3 T. Arampatzis, J. Lygeros, S. Manesis, A survey of applications of wireless sensors and wireless sensor networks, in: Intelligent Control, 2005 Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on, Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, 2005, pp. 719-724.Google Scholar
4. b4 Y. Chen, Q. Zhao, On the lifetime of wireless sensor networks, IEEE Commun. Lett., 9 (2005) 976-978.Google ScholarCross Ref
5. b5 Ingenu, How RPMA Works:The Making of RPMA, Ebook by Ingenu, 2016Google Scholar
6. b6 M. Centenaro, L. Vangelista, A. Zanella, M. Zorzi, Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: the rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios, IEEE Wirel. Commun., 23 (2016) 60-67. Google ScholarDigital Library
7. b7 K. Mikhaylov, J. Petaejaejaervi, T. Haenninen, Analysis of capacity and scalability of the LoRa low power wide area network technology, in: European Wireless 2016; 22th European Wireless Conference, 2016, pp. 119-124.Google Scholar
8. b8 G. Margelis, R. Piechocki, D. Kaleshi, P. Thomas, Low Throughput Networks for the IoT: Lessons learned from industrial implementations, in: Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum on, 2015, pp. 181-186. Google Scholar
9. b9 S. Soro, W. Heinzelman, Prolonging the lifetime of wireless sensor networks via unequal clustering, in: Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2005 Proceedings. 19th IEEE International, 2005, pp. 236244 Google Scholar
10. b10 N. Kaur, S.K. Sood, An energy-efficient architecture for the Internet of Things (IoT), IEEE Syst. J. (2015).Google Scholar
11. b11 F.K. Shaikh, S. Zeadally, E. Exposito, Enabling technologies for green Internet of Things, IEEE Syst. J. (2015).Google Scholar
12. b12 R. Vullers, R. Schaijk, H. Visser, J. Penders, C. Hoof, Energy harvesting for autonomous wireless sensor networks, IEEE Solid-State Circuit Mag., 2 (2010) 29-38.Google ScholarCross Ref
13. b13 S. Sudevalayam, P. Kulkarni, Energy harvesting sensor nodes: Survey and implications, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 13 (2011) 443-461.Google ScholarCross Ref
14. b14 M. Gorlatova, J. Sarik, G. Grebla, M. Cong, I. Kymissis, G. Zussman, Movers and shakers: Kinetic energy harvesting for the Internet of Things, in: The 2014 ACM International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, SIGMETRICS 14, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2014, pp. 407-419. Google Scholar
15. b15 N. Michelusi, K. Stamatiou, M. Zorzi, Transmission policies for energy harvesting sensors with time-correlated energy supply, IEEE Trans. Commun., 61 (2013) 2988-3001.Google ScholarCross Ref
16. b16 J. Geng, L. Lai, Non-bayesian quickest change detection with stochastic sample right constraints, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 61 (2013) 5090-5102. Google ScholarDigital Library
17. b17 M. Mandjes, D. Mitra, W. Scheinhardt, Models of network access using feedback fluid queues, Queueing Syst., 44 (2003) 2989-3002. Google ScholarCross Ref
18. b18 H.E. Kankaya, N. Akar, Solving multi-regime feedback fluid queues, Stoch. Models, 24 (2008) 425-450.Google ScholarCross Ref
19. b19 M.A. Yazici, N. Akar, The finite/infinite horizon ruin problem with multi-threshold premiums: a Markov fluid queue approach, Ann. Oper. Res. (2016).Google Scholar
20. b20 G. Jones, P. Harrison, U. Harder, T. Field, Fluid queue models of battery life, in: Modeling, Analysis Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, MASCOTS, 2011 IEEE 19th International Symposium on, 2011, pp. 278285 Google Scholar
21. b21 G.L. Jones,, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, 2014.Google Scholar
22. b22 S. Ulukus, A. Yener, E. Erkip, O. Simeone, M. Zorzi, P. Grover, K. Huang, Energy harvesting wireless communications: A review of recent advances, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 33 (2015) 360-381.Google ScholarCross Ref
23. b23 J. Yang, S. Ulukus, Optimal packet scheduling in an energy harvesting communication system, IEEE Trans. Commun., 60 (2012) 220-230.Google ScholarCross Ref
24. b24 V. Sharma, U. Mukherji, V. Joseph, S. Gupta, Optimal energy management policies for energy harvesting sensor nodes, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 9 (2010) 1326-1336. Google ScholarDigital Library
25. b25 C.K. Ho, P.D. Khoa, P.C. Ming, Markovian models for harvested energy in wireless communications, in: Communication Systems, ICCS, 2010 IEEE International Conference on, 2010, pp. 311315Google Scholar
26. b26 M.L. Ku, Y. Chen, K. Liu, Data-driven stochastic models and policies for energy harvesting sensor communications, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 33 (2015) 1505-1520.Google Scholar
27. b27 P. Lee, Z.A. Eu, M. Han, H. Tan, Empirical modeling of a solar-powered energy harvesting wireless sensor node for time-slotted operation, in: Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC, 2011 IEEE, 2011, pp. 179-184.Google Scholar
28. b28 J. Lei, R. Yates, L. Greenstein, A generic model for optimizing single-hop transmission policy of replenishable sensors, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 8 (2009) 547-551. Google ScholarDigital Library
29. b29 H. Kantz, D. Holstein, M. Ragwitz, N.K. Vitanov, Markov chain model for turbulent wind speed data, Physica A, 342 (2004) 315-321.Google Scholar
30. b30 A. Biason, M. Zorzi, Transmission policies for an energy harvesting device with a data queue, in: Computing, Networking and Communications, ICNC, 2015 International Conference on, 2015, pp. 189195Google Scholar
31. b31 N. Edalat, M. Motani, J. Walrand, L. Huang, A methodology for designing the control of energy harvesting sensor nodes, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 33 (2015) 598-607.Google Scholar
32. b32 V. Joseph, V. Sharma, U. Mukherji, Optimal sleep-wake policies for an energy harvesting sensor node, in: Communications, 2009 ICC 09 IEEE International Conference on, 2009, pp. 16 Google Scholar
33. b33 Y.M. Kadioglu, E. Gelenbe, Packet transmission with K energy packets in an energy harvesting sensor, in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Energy-Aware Simulation, ENERGY-SIM 16, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2016, pp. 1:1-1:6. Google ScholarDigital Library
34. b34 A. Kansal, J. Hsu, S. Zahedi, M.B. Srivastava, Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks, ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst., 6 (2007) 32. Google ScholarDigital Library
35. b35 C. Vigorito, D. Ganesan, A. Barto, Adaptive control of duty cycling in energy-harvesting wireless sensor networks, in: Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2007 SECON 07 4th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on, 2007, pp. 2130Google Scholar
36. b36 R. Chan, P. Zhang, W. Zhang, I. Nevat, A. Valera, H.-X. Tan, N. Gautam, Adaptive duty cycling in sensor networks via Continuous Time Markov Chain modelling, in: Communications, ICC, 2015 IEEE International Conference on, 2015, pp. 6669-6674.Google Scholar
37. b37 J. Yang, X. Wu, J. Wu, Adaptive sensing scheduling for energy harvesting sensors with finite battery, in: Communications, ICC, 2015 IEEE International Conference on, 2015, pp. 98103Google Scholar
38. b38 D. Anick, D. Mitra, M.M. Sondhi, Stochastic theory of a data-handling system with multiple sources, Bell Syst. Tech. J., 61 (1982) 1871-1894.Google ScholarCross Ref
39. b39 R.C.F. Tucker, Accurate method for analysis of a packet-speech multiplexer with limited delay, IEEE Trans. Commun., 36 (1988) 479-483.Google ScholarCross Ref
40. b40 V.G. Kulkarni, Fluid models for single buffer systems, in: Frontiers in Queueing: Models and Applications in Science and Engineering, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997, pp. 321-338. Google Scholar
41. b41 E. Gelenbe, I. Mitrani,, Imperial College Press, London, UK, 2010.Google Scholar
42. b42 A. Badescu, S. Drekic, D. Landriault, On the analysis of a multi-threshold Markovian risk model, Scand. Actuar. J., 2007 (2007) 248-260.Google ScholarCross Ref
43. b43 A. daSilvaSoares, G. Latouche, Fluid queues with level dependent evolution, European J. Oper. Res., 196 (2009) 1041-1048.Google Scholar
44. b44 M.A. Yazici, N. Akar, The workload-dependent MAP/PH/1 queue with infinite/finite workload capacity, Perform. Eval., 70 (2013) 1047-1058. Google ScholarDigital Library
45. b45 N. Gautam, A. Mohapatra, Efficiently operating wireless nodes powered by renewable energy sources, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 33 (2015) 1706-1716.Google Scholar
46. b46 O.H. Abdelrahman, E. Gelenbe, A diffusion model for energy harvesting sensor nodes, in: IEEE 24th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, MASCOTS16, London, UK, 2016Google Scholar
47. b47 L.X. Cai, H.V. Poor, Y. Liu, T.H. Luan, X. Shen, J.W. Mark, Dimensioning network deployment and resource management in green mesh networks, IEEE Wirel. Commun., 18 (2011) 58-65.Google ScholarCross Ref
48. b48 O. Galinina, K. Mikhaylov, S. Andreev, A. Turlikov, Y. Koucheryavy, Smart home gateway system over bluetooth low energy with wireless energy transfer capability, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw., 2015 (2015) 178.Google Scholar
49. b49 S. Asmussen, H. Albrecher,, World Scientific, 2010.Google Scholar
50. b50 S. Asmussen, F. Avram, M. Usabel, Erlangian approximations for finite-horizon ruin probabilities, Astin Bull., 32 (2002) 267-282.Google ScholarCross Ref
51. b51 M. Yazici, N. Akar, Analysis of continuous feedback Markov fluid queues and its applications to modeling optical burst switching, in: Teletraffic Congress, ITC, 2013 25th International, 2013, pp. 18Google Scholar
52. b52 W.R. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, H. Balakrishnan, Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks, in: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-Volume 8 - Volume 8, HICSS 00, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2000, pp. 8020. Google Scholar
53. b53 K.-W. Fan, Z. Zheng, P. Sinha, Steady and fair rate allocation for rechargeable sensors in perpetual sensor networks, in: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, SenSys 08, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2008, pp. 239-252. Google ScholarDigital Library
54. b54 Y. Zhang, S. He, J. Chen, Y. Sun, X. Shen, Distributed sampling rate control for rechargeable sensor nodes with limited battery capacity, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 12 (2013) 3096-3106.Google ScholarCross Ref
55. b55 U of Oregon Solar Radiation Laboratory. Northwest solar resource maps {online} (Jul 2013)Google Scholar
56. b56 S. Zhang, A. Seyedi, B. Sikdar, An analytical approach to the design of energy harvesting wireless sensor nodes, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 12 (2013) 4010-4024.Google ScholarCross Ref

Index Terms

1. Markov fluid queue model of an energy harvesting IoT device with adaptive sensing

   1. Networks

      1. Network types

         1. Mobile networks

• Energy management algorithm for solar‐powered energy harvesting wireless sensor node for Internet of Things

  The solar powered energy harvesting sensor node is a key technology for Internet of Things (IoT), but currently it offers only a small amount of energy storage and is capable of harvesting only a trivial amount of energy. Therefore, new technology for ...

  Read More

• Energy harvesting discontinuous reception (DRX) mechanism in wireless powered cellular networks

  The energy harvesting paradigm enables the design of new wireless powered cellular networks (WPCNs) for the Internet‐of‐Things (IoT). In a WPCN, if the harvested energy is larger than the consumed energy, an IoT device may utilise the surplus harvested ...

  Read More

• IoT adaptive threshold energy management algorithm based on energy harvesting

  Abstract

  The Internet of Things (IoT) provides a promising solution to resolve pipeline conditions and oil and gas leakage detection problems. How to realize complex data monitoring and data uploading in energy-constrained sensor nodes is an urgent ...

  Read More